Primary Sources:
Washington Irving:
http://bit.ly/nty7Qg
Columbus Diary:
http://bit.ly/o4Ntyr
Monday, August 22, 2011
Monday, May 23, 2011
Third Group of Reviews in May
Neter@s,
What is better than May showers? Five more reviews, of course. This productive month brings you another set of fine discussions of books. In addition to works concerned with Mexico and Argentina, these reviews involve the topics of the Atlantic slave trade, the literature of the early modern Atlantic, and the Haitian Revolution. We are proud to include a review in Spanish and reviewers from various disciplines. We hope you will find them interesting and useful.
Chris Bongie (Queen's University) does more than write a good book review. He takes Jeremy D. Popkins latest book as a prism to offer a glimpse of developments in Haitian Revolutionary Studies. That he begins with an otherwise inconspicuous source should show the reader that this essay delves into deep waters. Popkins’ book, Bongie tells us, does the necessary task of highlighting the importance of the year 1793 and the burning of Cap Français, then the most energetic city of the Caribbean. The book is a model of well-written scholarship; it did not earn the Pinkney Prize for nothing. But with his signature style, Bongie brings out the political in the writing of this book, which seems to deliberately lack such a dimension—a lack that Bongie claims is itself political. Both, the book and the review are must-reads for those interested in the history of the Haitian Revolution.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31431
Stephen Allen (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey) reviews Kevin B. Witherspoon’s book at a time when scores of people around the world are feeling nostalgic and even drawing parallels between today and the year 1968. In _Before the Eyes of the World_ Witherspoon explains how the 1968 Summer Olympics coincided with several interests and currents that helped produced the sensational events characteristic of that fateful year. It is a history of sports, politics, race and international diplomacy. To a certain extent, this book is a welcome study of the Cold War and the 1960s radicalism outside of the United States— far too many scholars see this period only through U.S. centric lenses, ignoring Bogota (Congreso Eucarístico), Mexico City (Olympics), and the 5 countries that declared independence from colonial powers that same year. Yet, as Allen tells us, despite its value, Witherspoon fails to make this study truly comparative or shared history; his accent stays in the U.S. rather than on Mexico.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31617
Luis A. Intersimone (Texas State University at San Marcos) considers Raanan Rein’s _In The Shadow of Perón_. How can you explain the broad and steady political support for populists like Juan Perón? Some readers may refer to the leader’s charisma and the cultural legacy of caudillismo as explanations of Latin American populism. The implication, which many early U.S. writers proposed, was that the emotional masses had little judgment when following such leaders (basis to which they assigned their supposedly lack of democratic abilities). But Rein, Intersimone tells us, explains that that is not the case; that masses are not irrational after all; that there is more to them than meets the eye. Rein takes the case of Perón’s leadership to demonstrate his point. But the focus is on those leaders that connected Perón to the masses. Rein does not diminish Perón’s charisma, however. Instead, he raises the importance of those on whom Perón relied, and shows, in splendid details, how Peronism’s personality cult actually worked to defeat its politics.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=32970
We are grateful to these excellent reviewers who contribute with their
time and expertise. I also want to thank the team of editors who help
me behind the scenes to keep the H-LatAm review project running.
Sincerely yours,
Dennis R. Hidalgo
H-LatAm
What is better than May showers? Five more reviews, of course. This productive month brings you another set of fine discussions of books. In addition to works concerned with Mexico and Argentina, these reviews involve the topics of the Atlantic slave trade, the literature of the early modern Atlantic, and the Haitian Revolution. We are proud to include a review in Spanish and reviewers from various disciplines. We hope you will find them interesting and useful.
Chris Bongie (Queen's University) does more than write a good book review. He takes Jeremy D. Popkins latest book as a prism to offer a glimpse of developments in Haitian Revolutionary Studies. That he begins with an otherwise inconspicuous source should show the reader that this essay delves into deep waters. Popkins’ book, Bongie tells us, does the necessary task of highlighting the importance of the year 1793 and the burning of Cap Français, then the most energetic city of the Caribbean. The book is a model of well-written scholarship; it did not earn the Pinkney Prize for nothing. But with his signature style, Bongie brings out the political in the writing of this book, which seems to deliberately lack such a dimension—a lack that Bongie claims is itself political. Both, the book and the review are must-reads for those interested in the history of the Haitian Revolution.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31431
Stephen Allen (Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey) reviews Kevin B. Witherspoon’s book at a time when scores of people around the world are feeling nostalgic and even drawing parallels between today and the year 1968. In _Before the Eyes of the World_ Witherspoon explains how the 1968 Summer Olympics coincided with several interests and currents that helped produced the sensational events characteristic of that fateful year. It is a history of sports, politics, race and international diplomacy. To a certain extent, this book is a welcome study of the Cold War and the 1960s radicalism outside of the United States— far too many scholars see this period only through U.S. centric lenses, ignoring Bogota (Congreso Eucarístico), Mexico City (Olympics), and the 5 countries that declared independence from colonial powers that same year. Yet, as Allen tells us, despite its value, Witherspoon fails to make this study truly comparative or shared history; his accent stays in the U.S. rather than on Mexico.
Srividhya Swaminathan (Long Island University) takes on the delicate task of reviewing the reissue of Seymour Drescher’s _Econocide_. There is no more striking question in the study of the Atlantic slave trade than the one posted by Eric Williams. Williams studied the abolition of the Atlantic slave trade through the eyes of an economist. His answer, first published in his doctoral thesis (1938) and in a 1940 article (_ The Journal of Negro History__), rocked the establishment. Ever since, all significant work on abolitionism has wrestled with Williams’ “Decline Thesis.” Drescher comes to the picture in 1977 as the champion of the idea that the British were well-intended, and that in pursuing abolitionism they actually committed economic suicide, hence the term “Econocide.” An interesting point of the republication of this work is that David Brion Davis, a long-time warden of Williams’ thesis, opens the book with a story of Drescher’s contribution to the debate. Swaminathan, however, tells in this review that Williams’ thesis cannot be entirely dismissed. She also tells us how Drescher contributed to complicate the picture and bring Latin American History into the discussion.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31617
Luis A. Intersimone (Texas State University at San Marcos) considers Raanan Rein’s _In The Shadow of Perón_. How can you explain the broad and steady political support for populists like Juan Perón? Some readers may refer to the leader’s charisma and the cultural legacy of caudillismo as explanations of Latin American populism. The implication, which many early U.S. writers proposed, was that the emotional masses had little judgment when following such leaders (basis to which they assigned their supposedly lack of democratic abilities). But Rein, Intersimone tells us, explains that that is not the case; that masses are not irrational after all; that there is more to them than meets the eye. Rein takes the case of Perón’s leadership to demonstrate his point. But the focus is on those leaders that connected Perón to the masses. Rein does not diminish Perón’s charisma, however. Instead, he raises the importance of those on whom Perón relied, and shows, in splendid details, how Peronism’s personality cult actually worked to defeat its politics.
Amanda Clark (Virginia Tech) examines a book about accounts of Whites taken captives by non-Europeans: Lisa Voigt’s _Writing Captivity in the Early Modern Atlantic_. The book is about literature and history. The narratives that Voigt inspects here range from those that are widely known, as el Inca Garcilaso de la Vega and John Smith’s Pocahontas, to less known ones like Francisco Nuñes de Pineda’s “Cautiverio Feliz,” and José de Santa Rita Durão’s “Caramurú.” Clark tells us that one of Voigt’s contributions is her emphasis on Ibero-American literature. This is a welcome feature because English sources have dominated early modern Atlantic studies for many years. Voigt’s main argument is that despite the authors’ bravery and apparent challenge to imperialism, all of these narratives worked to sustain the imperial project. By offering to the Western World narratives that described how was being a captive among barbarians these ex-captives not only reinforced the non-Western “Otherness,” but also justified their colonialism. Clark, however, goes even further by making the case that these sources were less effective than what Voigt suggests and that the empires’ control over the production of knowledge was more effective than assumed here.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=32970
We are grateful to these excellent reviewers who contribute with their
time and expertise. I also want to thank the team of editors who help
me behind the scenes to keep the H-LatAm review project running.
Sincerely yours,
Dennis R. Hidalgo
H-LatAm
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
May's Second Set of Reviews
Dear Neter@s,
In our second bouquet of reviews this month we offer you analyses of five books covering the countries of Chile, Mexico and the Andean region. They also deal with the topics of U.S. and Latin American Historiography, colonial medicine, modern propaganda, presidential politics, indigenous political systems, and cultural anthropology. We invite you to take pleasure and benefit fromtheir reading. I offer you simple summaries to whet your appetite
Susan E. Ramirez (Texas Christian University) offers us a close analysis of the peculiar work of cultural anthropologist Denise Arnold and archaeologist Christine Hastorf in the book _Heads of State_. In this book Arnold and Hastorf look at the symbolic power of heads in the Andes, and elaborate a hypothesis about cultural practice and indigenous political systems. In the review, Ramirez tells us she found merit in the discussion on the importance of heads in centripetal versus centrifugal polities. Also useful was the discussion on the Andean heterarchichal system of organization, teeming with overlays, multiplicity, and mixed ascendancy,but concurrent with patterns of relation. This argument relates with recent scholarshipthat point to a less centralized system of politics in the Andes than previously thought. Ramirez, however, found that from the historian point of view the book opens itself to a huge gap in time full of anachronisms, which tends to take some issues for granted (i.e., the concept of the Ayllu). Nevertheless, this is a book Ramirez recommends reading.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31882
Peter Villella (University of North Carolina in Greensboro) reflects on Sherry Field’s _Pestilence and Headcolds_. How would life be in a time when everybody, from the top-level ranks of society to the least known person, is dreadfully concerned with death? What underlying epistemologies would we find beneath the plethora of health and wellnesspractices people used to survive? Field’s book focuses on colonial Mexico and looks at the cultureof sickness and health in the time when epidemics and the loss of life were unprecedented. This is also the time in which people lived in the midst of two apparently opposing cosmologies; one informed by indigenous belief in the supernatural sources of illness and the other acquainted with the medieval humorism of Galenus. Field’s main contributions, according to Villella, are in the synthesis of thescholarship and in the broad interpretative framework. Despiteits structural limitations (i.e., extensiveness), the reader can learn about a world in which a cut, a minor infection and even a sniffle could be ground for distress.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31466
Thomas Schoonover (University of Louisiana at Lafayette) reviews Helen Delpar’s book, _Looking South_. Delpar’s contribution to scholarship is one that present historiography in a different package: as a narrative of the history of US people fascinated with the study of Latin America since the 19th Century. This is a study of both US, and Latin American History, but seen principally from the eyes of US writers. Here we learn about why the more formal and scholarly interest in Latin America began after the works of people like William H. Prescott and Washington Irving. Delpar informs the reader about the development of professional and academic institutions that led to the current forms of Latin American scholarship in the US. Schoonover argues that in telling us personal narratives Delpar has made historiography enjoyable to read.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31628
Jadwiga E. Pieper Mooney tells us about a book that Silvia Borzutzky and Gregory B. Weeks have edited, which sheds light on why voters in Chile chose a government of the right to replace Michelle Bachelet. But this is not a pundit book attempting to explain in vain the inscrutable course of presidential elections. Instead, it is a collection of fine scholarly essays querying the historical post-Pinochet period. The focus is the Bachelet’s administration, as the book title would reveal: _The Bachelet Government_. That she was the first Chilean women president is just one of the many points of interest of her presidency. She also openly attempted the impossible: to promote a more equal society while still adhering to most of the neoliberal policies of her predecessors. As it happens often with political histories, the consensus of these authors is that the realities are more interesting and more complex than what they appear from a distance. At the end, you may not know everything with certainty, but after reading this book, Pieper Mooney affirms, at least you gain a better insight on why the nation took the direction it did in the last election.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31660
Andrae Marak reviews a book about the production of propaganda, governmental and otherwise, in post-revolutionary Mexico. The word propaganda often masquerades the manipulation of people’s opinions. Monica A. Rankin, however, uses a less narrow definition in her book, _¡Mexico, la patria!_. In it, she looks for patterns in the messages aimed at large Mexican audiences within the span of three periods: before WII, during WII and post-WII. The book offers suggestions, but avoids gauging the propaganda effects on people. It also brings new light into the U.S. and Mexico’s relations. Most interesting to me is how Rankin shows the symbolic (and discursive) co-option of the Mexican Revolution. In the 1940s, with the purpose of promoting national unity, the Ávila Camacho government successfully propagated the idea of the Mexican Revolution as a positive historical event that had set the nation on a democratic process. Taken as a whole, the nation-building messages behind all propaganda schemes, either from the right or from the left, were aimed to both industrialize and homogenize cultural Mexico. Marak recommends Rankin’s work as necessary for those studying post-revolutionary Mexico and those wanting to explore modern propaganda production.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=32059
I want to thank our competent reviewers and dependable H-LatAm editors who have loaned me a “second pair of eyes” to read the reviews.
Cheers,
Dennis R. Hidalgo
In our second bouquet of reviews this month we offer you analyses of five books covering the countries of Chile, Mexico and the Andean region. They also deal with the topics of U.S. and Latin American Historiography, colonial medicine, modern propaganda, presidential politics, indigenous political systems, and cultural anthropology. We invite you to take pleasure and benefit fromtheir reading. I offer you simple summaries to whet your appetite
Susan E. Ramirez (Texas Christian University) offers us a close analysis of the peculiar work of cultural anthropologist Denise Arnold and archaeologist Christine Hastorf in the book _Heads of State_. In this book Arnold and Hastorf look at the symbolic power of heads in the Andes, and elaborate a hypothesis about cultural practice and indigenous political systems. In the review, Ramirez tells us she found merit in the discussion on the importance of heads in centripetal versus centrifugal polities. Also useful was the discussion on the Andean heterarchichal system of organization, teeming with overlays, multiplicity, and mixed ascendancy,but concurrent with patterns of relation. This argument relates with recent scholarshipthat point to a less centralized system of politics in the Andes than previously thought. Ramirez, however, found that from the historian point of view the book opens itself to a huge gap in time full of anachronisms, which tends to take some issues for granted (i.e., the concept of the Ayllu). Nevertheless, this is a book Ramirez recommends reading.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31882
Peter Villella (University of North Carolina in Greensboro) reflects on Sherry Field’s _Pestilence and Headcolds_. How would life be in a time when everybody, from the top-level ranks of society to the least known person, is dreadfully concerned with death? What underlying epistemologies would we find beneath the plethora of health and wellnesspractices people used to survive? Field’s book focuses on colonial Mexico and looks at the cultureof sickness and health in the time when epidemics and the loss of life were unprecedented. This is also the time in which people lived in the midst of two apparently opposing cosmologies; one informed by indigenous belief in the supernatural sources of illness and the other acquainted with the medieval humorism of Galenus. Field’s main contributions, according to Villella, are in the synthesis of thescholarship and in the broad interpretative framework. Despiteits structural limitations (i.e., extensiveness), the reader can learn about a world in which a cut, a minor infection and even a sniffle could be ground for distress.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31466
Thomas Schoonover (University of Louisiana at Lafayette) reviews Helen Delpar’s book, _Looking South_. Delpar’s contribution to scholarship is one that present historiography in a different package: as a narrative of the history of US people fascinated with the study of Latin America since the 19th Century. This is a study of both US, and Latin American History, but seen principally from the eyes of US writers. Here we learn about why the more formal and scholarly interest in Latin America began after the works of people like William H. Prescott and Washington Irving. Delpar informs the reader about the development of professional and academic institutions that led to the current forms of Latin American scholarship in the US. Schoonover argues that in telling us personal narratives Delpar has made historiography enjoyable to read.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31628
Jadwiga E. Pieper Mooney tells us about a book that Silvia Borzutzky and Gregory B. Weeks have edited, which sheds light on why voters in Chile chose a government of the right to replace Michelle Bachelet. But this is not a pundit book attempting to explain in vain the inscrutable course of presidential elections. Instead, it is a collection of fine scholarly essays querying the historical post-Pinochet period. The focus is the Bachelet’s administration, as the book title would reveal: _The Bachelet Government_. That she was the first Chilean women president is just one of the many points of interest of her presidency. She also openly attempted the impossible: to promote a more equal society while still adhering to most of the neoliberal policies of her predecessors. As it happens often with political histories, the consensus of these authors is that the realities are more interesting and more complex than what they appear from a distance. At the end, you may not know everything with certainty, but after reading this book, Pieper Mooney affirms, at least you gain a better insight on why the nation took the direction it did in the last election.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31660
Andrae Marak reviews a book about the production of propaganda, governmental and otherwise, in post-revolutionary Mexico. The word propaganda often masquerades the manipulation of people’s opinions. Monica A. Rankin, however, uses a less narrow definition in her book, _¡Mexico, la patria!_. In it, she looks for patterns in the messages aimed at large Mexican audiences within the span of three periods: before WII, during WII and post-WII. The book offers suggestions, but avoids gauging the propaganda effects on people. It also brings new light into the U.S. and Mexico’s relations. Most interesting to me is how Rankin shows the symbolic (and discursive) co-option of the Mexican Revolution. In the 1940s, with the purpose of promoting national unity, the Ávila Camacho government successfully propagated the idea of the Mexican Revolution as a positive historical event that had set the nation on a democratic process. Taken as a whole, the nation-building messages behind all propaganda schemes, either from the right or from the left, were aimed to both industrialize and homogenize cultural Mexico. Marak recommends Rankin’s work as necessary for those studying post-revolutionary Mexico and those wanting to explore modern propaganda production.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=32059
I want to thank our competent reviewers and dependable H-LatAm editors who have loaned me a “second pair of eyes” to read the reviews.
Cheers,
Dennis R. Hidalgo
Monday, May 2, 2011
Reviews: The First Five of May 2011
The first week of May welcomes us with five exciting reviews. They cover the topics of (1) autobiography as a form of historical journey in Jamaica, (2) little known, but notable Cuban art, (3) an attempt to understand paramilitary and death squads, (4) the role of enslaved soldiers in the wars for independence, and (5) an essay on a contentious book about the Catholic Church in Latin America. True to our international appeal, we continue publishing reviews in Spanish (and seek to publish in French and Portuguese) and search for diverse and able reviewers, even outside of the United States (and aim to review more works published abroad too).
Alexandrine Boudreault-Fournier (Université Laval) writes in
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31743Jayeel S. Cornelio (National University of Singapore) takes the arduous task of bringing into a scholarly di
My sincere thanks to the reviewers for their contributions and for the support from H-LatAm editors.
Cheers,
Dennis R. Hidalgo
H-LatAm Reviews
Saturday, April 30, 2011
About Haiti, Brazil and a Commodity Chain
Last of April’s Reviews
Today we present to you three reviews. One is about the momentous yet inscrutable Caribbean Revolution in Haiti (perhaps more significant now after the devastating 2010 earthquake). Another is about Brazil’s remarkable recent political history and foreign relations. And the last review is about cocaine, and though spotlighting the Andean region, it covers much more than that. So, with them we have a fair representation of Latin American geography.
Erica Johnson (Florida State University) first tells us that the book, _The Tree of Liberty_, is worth reading because it helps illuminate the many perplexing and subtle repercussions of the successful Haitian transformationfrom colonial slavery on Hispaniola. The editor of this collection, Doris L. Garraway, have gathered an exciting team of interdisciplinary scholars to examine cause and effect, literary consequence, and (most stimulating to me) the tracking of rumors and dissemination of ideas among Black populations outside of Haiti. At the core are concerns from scholars like Michel-Rolph Trouillot and David Patrick Geggus, who during the 1990s tried to initiate deeper understanding and interest on the Haitian Revolution and its impact throughout the Atlantic. Johnson gives us a close analysis of the original essays in this collection, helping to place them into its historiographical context.
In the second review, Shawn Smallman (Portland State University) informs us about Brazil’s potentially new boom through an examination of Sean W. Burges’ book. Smallman explains how _Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War_ is among the best of a number ofpublications trying to explain Brazil’s political and economic resurgence in the last two decades. Smallman guides us through the book, shows the tricky research approach Burges had to do, and proves its value within its historiography. And as Smallman persuasively writes of Brazil’s economic discipline and political surprises, he also explains how the book’s limitations are as important as its strengths. This book, Smallman argues, is both accessible and a required reading for all advanced students, but even policymaking and those casually interested in Brazilian affairs should consider reading it.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31664
Elaine Carey (St. Johns University) reviews the third book in this group, a work that has received significant attention even outside of scholarly circles. Carey tells us how Paul Gootenberg’s _Andean Cocaine_ is not your ordinary story of the miracle drug. It is rather a compelling account produced by a first-rate, multi-archival research. Gootenberg wrote a nuanced account of a currently controversial commodity chain (with all of its emotional baggage) as a product of a historical development. By observing how the plant became a national hope, then a medicine and next a narcotic (vice), we grasp a deeper understanding of not simply individual struggles, but of the particular nature of this epoch’s political economy. As Carey reminds us, there is a difference between coca and cocaine, and if we are able to distinguish these words’ historical contexts, we may come out of this reading a bit more enlightened. Carey’s review is an excellent introduction to the book, which she shows to be relevant to the entire hemisphere’s history.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=32733
I offer my sincere thanks to the reviewers and to the editorial team behind H-LatAm’s review project.
Sunday, April 17, 2011
The One Left Behind Is Now With US
Dear Neteros,
A review that got delayed last Friday is now available.
In it, Norberto Barreto Velázquez performed a most difficult and yet necessary job of going through Julian Go’s dense book and distilling its essentials. Go, in an attempt at comparative history, looks at the elite’s in the Philippines and Puerto Rico as they struggled, maneuvered and adapted to living under the new American colonial masters. Barreto Velázquez’s review is a must-read for those interested in the subject of U.S. imperialism and those working on similar comparative works. Differently from the book itself, the review is readable and sensible. The fact that it is in Spanish shows our commitment to publish in languages other than English.
Saturday, April 16, 2011
"The Broad and the Deep," introduction to H-LatAm reviews
Dear Neteros, We are happy to present four reviews for your enjoyment. As a group, they hint at the full length of interests implied in Latin American History. Both major periods are here represented, as well as South America and the Caribbean region. Our luck is such that among these reviews you will even find two essays attempting to do more than just examining a book.
1- In the review entitled, “Bolivia(s) Ascending,” David Sheinin opens up for us a collection of essays about Bolivia’s recent history. He does more than just reveal the publication’s links to the current administration. Sheinin is critical, but he also helps us see Evo Morales outside of the polarizing rhetoric that have characterized the recent events in Bolivia, and appreciate both his administration’s appeal and limitations.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31614
David M. K. Sheininhttp://www.trentu.ca/history/publications_sheinin.php
2- Matilde Zimmermann provides us with a sense of the current debate over theinvasion of Bay of Pig or or Playa Girón by interlacing the critical examinations of two recent books. One of the books is a valuable Spanish translation, with a stimulating analysis, which reflects the author’s relative advantage on the island of Cuba. The other book is also predisposed, but toward the U.S., where the author originated. Both books mostly rely on different caches of sources, and as such they are more useful together than in isolation,
which is why Zimmermann tied them in tandem.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31785
Matilde Zimmermann
http://www.slc.edu/undergraduate/study/history-social-sciences/history/faculty.html
3- The essay on Lascasian Studies is also an attempt to appreciate the field rather than just a single book. In here Lawrence A. Clayton focuses on three fairly currentbooks to draw attention to larger and older patterns of thinking about Bartolomé de las Casas. In this relatively longer essay, Clayton considers most major works about the “Defender of the Indians” to offer a heartfelt sympathetic line of reasoning in favor of Las Casas’s legacy. Meant to incite discussion, this essay takes a definitive position in a debate as old as the man himself.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31181
Lawrence A. Clayton, University of Alabama
http://www.as.ua.edu/history/html/faculty/clayton.html
4- In, “Evolution of the Cuban Revolution,” Frank Argote-Freyre uses his familiarity with older versions of Balfour’s profile on Castro to assess the newness in the latest edition. By studying Castro we also study the Cuban Revolution, and in Balfour’s
book we are reminded about key points like how in the internal debates within the Cuban Revolution José Martí was more important than even Karl Marx. Argote-Freyre offers an engaging and impartial assessment of the book.
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31445
Frank Argote-Freyre, Kean University
http://www.kean.edu/~history/faculty.html#FRANK_ARGOTE-FREYRE
Thanks, again to my colleague editors Peter Blanchard, John F. Schwaller and Matthew D. Rothwell.
Sincerely yours,
Dennis R. Hidalgo
H-LatAm Review Editor
Virginia Tech
Monday, March 21, 2011
H-LatAm Reviews: On Crises, Transnationalism, and Madness
Dear Neteros, 
Today we offer you reviews of books on three of the largest human ecologies of Latin America. These reviews range from mental illness in the southern cone, to the overflowing of Caribbean culture, and all the way to rhythms of crises in Mexico. The books are a monograph and two collections of essays. They are mostly concerned with the national period.
In the first review, Luis García Fanlo tells us about a book that unravels Buenos Aires’ madness as part of nation building. The Nineteenth Century brought more than immigrants and science to explain normalcy. There was a sinister positive design for homogeneity. To be crazy was not simply a mental illness, but also the unwillingness or incapacity to fit conceptual molds of citizenship. Fanlo tells us that Jonathan Ablard’s book, _Madness in Buenos Aires_, fills a niche in the history of psychiatry. In short, through careful archival research, the book’s author shows how cultural, political and social factors helped determine the capacity of the state to define and provide mental services. The reader may reasonably ask how would Ablard’s approach compare to Foucault’s study on madness and how was Argentina different from, for example, Brazil?
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31688
While exploring _Constructing Vernacular Culture_ Kate Houlden shows us a book on the edge of inter-disciplinarity that studies the Caribbean region through an array of provocative angles. This is a collection of fifteen tightly written essays meant to push the envelope. The authors propose to look at the Caribbean not only through the islands, but also beyond them to include the diasporic communities, to examine the migratory culture through the volatile vernacular and to include the electronic world as more
than an abstract venue of connection (among other views). Hardly any aspect of the trans-Caribbean culture goes unchallenged; even gossip is shown as a form of agency. And yet, the reviewer carefully reveals where the essays are at their best and where they could have been better. The historian may find this collection of studies a tease or a stimulus to move beyond geographical and traditional approaches to studying Caribbean History (the late nineteenth-century Antillean leaders/writers like Martí, Hostos, and Betances would be grateful).
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31721
Timothy J. Henderson cracks open _Cycles of Conflict, Centuries of Change_ a loquacious book of loosely assembled essays centered on a comparative rubric of Mexican revolutions or crises. The editors are concerned with the possibility that there is a spiral pattern of some sort revealed in the years of 1810 and 1910. (A colonialist could even add the years 1519, 1610s and 1710s). Are we seeing here a (rather dismal) vision of the future? The book brought together a group of well-known Mexicanists who, while exceptionally redundant, do manage to suggest new approaches and directions for the study of Mexican revolutions/crises. Yet, I still wonder if there aren’t enough commanding events in Mexican history for the historian to create countless of other rhythmic patterns?
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=31471
A big thank-you to the reviewers for their time and for sharing their analyses with us:
Luis García Fanlo, Universidad de Buenos Aires
https://profiles.google.com/106846042918531195240/about
Kate Houlden, Queen Mary, University of London
http://qmul.academia.edu/KateHoulden
Timothy J. Henderson, Auburn University Montgomery
http://www.aum.edu/profile_ektid9416.aspx
And thank-you also to the team of editors from H-LatAm who assisted me in preparing these reviews for publication:
Peter Blanchard
Matthew Rothwell
John F. Schwaller
Sincerely yours,
Dennis R. Hidalgo
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)